<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Benson Schliesser - Latest Comments in Cloud: Private vs Public, Internal vs External, Oh My!</title><link>http://bensons.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bensons.disqus.com/cloud_private_vs_public_internal_vs_external_oh_my/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:16:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cloud: Private vs Public, Internal vs External, Oh My!</title><link>http://www.queuefull.net/~bensons/2009/09/15/cloud-private-vs-public-internal-vs-external-oh-my/#comment-55990395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep! I was agreed, I'll keep in touch to your blog. This blog is so usefully, Thanks for the posted ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dust Collector Remote</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cloud: Private vs Public, Internal vs External, Oh My!</title><link>http://www.queuefull.net/~bensons/2009/09/15/cloud-private-vs-public-internal-vs-external-oh-my/#comment-40705589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good arguments overall - widening the characteristics in the definiition would lad to an even more serious anarchy than muddying the waters - Internal and external clouds definition are best defined with ownership - likewise private and public clouds are also simply defined by control - the only problem is - how do we then expand the characteristics to define virtual private and virtual public clouds&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CiscoTech Wizard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:02:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>